Home Comparison GeForce RTX 5090 vs FirePro V7800

GeForce RTX 5090 vs FirePro V7800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5090 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce RTX 5090 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2407MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.79TB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
20320 additional rendering cores
FirePro V7800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 575W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 5090 +5098%
104800
FirePro V7800
2016

Graphics Card

Jan 2025
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 50
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2017 MHz
Base Clock
-
2407 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR7
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.79TB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
18
170
SM Count
-
21760
Shading Units
1440
680
TMUs
72
176
ROPs
32
680
Tensor Cores
-
170
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
96 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

423.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
1637 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
104.8 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
104.8 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
1.637 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

575W
TDP
150W
950 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1b 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GB202
GPU Name
Cypress
GB202-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Blackwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
92.2 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
750 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
12.0
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net