Home Comparison GeForce RTX 5090 vs FireMV 2400 PCI

GeForce RTX 5090 vs FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5090 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce RTX 5090 's Advantages
Released 17 years late
Boost Clock2407MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.79TB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
21760 additional rendering cores
FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 575W)

Score

Graphics Card

Jan 2025
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 50
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

2017 MHz
Base Clock
-
2407 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR7
Memory Type
DDR
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.79TB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

170
SM Count
-
21760
Shading Units
-
680
TMUs
4
176
ROPs
4
680
Tensor Cores
-
170
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
96 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

423.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
1637 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
104.8 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
104.8 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
1.637 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

575W
TDP
20W
950 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1b 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GB202
GPU Name
RV380
GB202-300-A1
GPU Variant
-
Blackwell 2.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
130 nm
92.2 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
750 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
12.0
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
-
© 2025 - TopCPU.net