GeForce RTX 5050 vs FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 5050 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 5050 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2520 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 5050
+40212%
12900
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
32
Graphics Card
Jan 2025
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 50
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 5.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
40
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
80.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
201.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
12.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.90 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
201.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
130W
TDP
32W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1b
3x DisplayPort 2.1b
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GB207
GPU Name
RV620
GB207-300-A1
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
Blackwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.181 billion
Unknown
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.4
Vulkan
N/A
10.1
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1