GeForce RTX 4090 vs GeForce GT 230
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 230 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.01TB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
16336 additional rendering cores
GeForce GT 230 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4090
+52835%
82580
GeForce GT 230
156
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
Oct 2009
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1.01TB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
128
SM Count
6
16384
Shading Units
48
512
TMUs
24
176
ROPs
16
512
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
443.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.40 GPixel/s
1290 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
82.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
82.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
156.0 GFLOPS
1290 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
450W
TDP
75W
850 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
G94B
AD102-300-A1
GPU Variant
G94-300-B1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
196 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.1
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
