GeForce RTX 4090 vs FirePro V4800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V4800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.01TB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
15984 additional rendering cores
FirePro V4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (69W vs 450W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4090
+13219%
82580
FirePro V4800
620
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
24GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.01TB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
5
128
SM Count
-
16384
Shading Units
400
512
TMUs
20
176
ROPs
8
512
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
72 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
443.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.200 GPixel/s
1290 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.50 GTexel/s
82.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
82.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
620.0 GFLOPS
1290 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
450W
TDP
69W
850 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Redwood
AD102-300-A1
GPU Variant
Redwood XT GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.0