Home Comparison GeForce RTX 4090 vs FireGL V3600

GeForce RTX 4090 vs FireGL V3600

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 and 256MB VRAM FireGL V3600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.01TB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
16264 additional rendering cores
FireGL V3600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (73W vs 450W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4090 +57247%
82580
FireGL V3600
144

Graphics Card

Sep 2022
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2235 MHz
Base Clock
-
2520 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1313 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

24GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
1.01TB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
128
SM Count
-
16384
Shading Units
120
512
TMUs
8
176
ROPs
4
512
Tensor Cores
-
128
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
72 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

443.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
1290 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.800 GTexel/s
82.58 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
82.58 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
144.0 GFLOPS
1290 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

450W
TDP
73W
850 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

AD102
GPU Name
RV630
AD102-300-A1
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
65 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
© 2025 - TopCPU.net