GeForce RTX 4080 vs FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4080 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (716.8GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
9648 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 320W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080
+60825%
48740
FirePro 2460 Multi View
80
Graphics Card
Sep 2022
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 40
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2205 MHz
Base Clock
-
2505 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
716.8GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
76
SM Count
-
9728
Shading Units
80
304
TMUs
8
112
ROPs
4
304
Tensor Cores
-
76
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
64 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
280.6 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
761.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
48.74 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
48.74 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
761.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
320W
TDP
17W
700 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD103
GPU Name
Cedar
AD103-300-A1
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
45.9 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
379 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0