GeForce RTX 4080 Ti vs GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 Ti and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 's Advantages
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (678.4GB/s vs 159.0GB/s)
13840 additional rendering cores
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (204W vs 400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080 Ti
+10281%
73500
GeForce GTX 285 Mac Edition
708
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2340 MHz
Base Clock
-
2610 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1325 MHz
Memory Clock
1242 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
678.4GB/s
Bandwidth
159.0GB/s
Render Config
110
SM Count
30
14080
Shading Units
240
440
TMUs
80
144
ROPs
32
440
Tensor Cores
-
110
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
80 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
375.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.74 GPixel/s
1148 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
73.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
73.50 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
708.5 GFLOPS
1148 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
88.56 GFLOPS
Board Design
400W
TDP
204W
800 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
GT200B
AD102-225-A1
GPU Variant
G200-350-B3
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
