GeForce RTX 4080 Ti vs FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4080 Ti and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4080 Ti 's Advantages
Boost Clock2610MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (678.4GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
12640 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4080 Ti
+3545%
73500
FireStream 9350
2016
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 40
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2340 MHz
Base Clock
-
2610 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1325 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
678.4GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
110
SM Count
-
14080
Shading Units
1440
440
TMUs
72
144
ROPs
32
440
Tensor Cores
-
110
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
80 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
375.8 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
1148 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
73.50 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
73.50 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
1148 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
400W
TDP
150W
800 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
AD102
GPU Name
Cypress
AD102-225-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
40 nm
76.3 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
609 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0