GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile 's Advantages
1536 additional rendering cores
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 19% (2010MHz vs 1695MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 115W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
+26%
15620
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
12350
Graphics Card
Jan 2023
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 40 Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1395 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
1695 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
36
SM Count
24
4608
Shading Units
3072
144
TMUs
96
48
ROPs
48
144
Tensor Cores
96
36
RT Cores
24
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
81.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
244.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
15.62 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
15.62 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
244.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
115W
TDP
50W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
AD107
GN21-X6
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
188 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.8
Shader Model
6.7
