GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB vs Moore Threads MTT S2000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock2535MHz
256 additional rendering cores
Moore Threads MTT S2000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 16GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 288.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (150W vs 165W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
+107%
22060
Moore Threads MTT S2000
10650
Graphics Card
May 2023
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 40
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2310 MHz
Base Clock
1300 MHz
2535 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
34
SM Count
-
4352
Shading Units
4096
136
TMUs
256
48
ROPs
256
136
Tensor Cores
-
34
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
121.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
332.8 GPixel/s
344.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
332.8 GTexel/s
22.06 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
21.30 TFLOPS
22.06 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.65 TFLOPS
344.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
166.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
165W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD106
GPU Name
MTT Gen 1
AD106-351-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
22.9 billion
Transistors
Unknown
188 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
8.9
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5
