GeForce RTX 4050 vs Radeon X1700 FSC
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock2640MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
2560 additional rendering cores
Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 115W)
Score
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 40
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2505 MHz
Base Clock
-
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
22.24GB/s
Render Config
18
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
120
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
32 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.348 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.348 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
115W
TDP
44W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
RV535
-
GPU Variant
RV535 FSC
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
80 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.33 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
131 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
3.0
