GeForce RTX 4050 vs Radeon R7 350 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 350 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 151% (2640MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (216.0GB/s vs 73.60GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores
Radeon R7 350 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 115W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050
+1577%
13520
Radeon R7 350 OEM
806
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 40
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
2505 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
73.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
18
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
384
80
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
120
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
115W
TDP
65W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x VGA
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
Oland
-
GPU Variant
Oland XT
(215-0837000)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
