GeForce RTX 4050 vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 and 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 4050 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 184% (2640MHz vs 928MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 3GB)
Lower TDP (115W vs 250W)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 216.0GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 4050
+152%
13520
GeForce GTX 780 Ti Engineering Sample
5345
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 40
Generation
GeForce 700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
2505 MHz
Base Clock
875 MHz
2640 MHz
Boost Clock
928 MHz
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
384bit
216.0GB/s
Bandwidth
336.6GB/s
Render Config
18
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
2880
80
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
48
120
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
32 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
84.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
55.68 GPixel/s
211.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.7 GTexel/s
13.52 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.52 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.345 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
115W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 12-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
GK180
-
GPU Variant
GK180-425-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.175
8.9
CUDA
3.5
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
