GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (2130MHz vs 1740MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 90W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
7127
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+68%
12000
Blender
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
1528
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+73%
2649
OctaneBench
GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
175
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+68%
295
Graphics Card
Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 30
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1545 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1740 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
22
2048
Shading Units
2816
64
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
64
Tensor Cores
88
16
RT Cores
22
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
7.127 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
7.127 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
111.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
90W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
AD107
GA107-140-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
5 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
