GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Radeon R5 A255
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 A255 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 57% (1477MHz vs 940MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
+739%
6050
Radeon R5 A255
721
Graphics Card
Dec 2021
Release Date
Jan 2014
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1185 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
1477 MHz
Boost Clock
940 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
64
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
47.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.520 GPixel/s
94.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.56 GTexel/s
12.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.050 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
721.9 GFLOPS
189.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
Unknown
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Topaz
-
GPU Variant
Topaz PRO
(216-0858030)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
1.55 billion
Unknown
Die Size
125 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5