GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and 256MB VRAM Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1477MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2008 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
+12504%
6050
Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
48
Graphics Card
Dec 2021
Release Date
May 2007
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
M7x
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1185 MHz
Base Clock
-
1477 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
40
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
64
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
47.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
94.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
12.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.050 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.00 GFLOPS
189.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
Unknown
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
M74
-
GPU Variant
M74-M
(216RMAKA12FG)
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.18 billion
Unknown
Die Size
85 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0