GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 285M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 285M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1477MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
+1475%
6050
GeForce GTX 285M
384
Graphics Card
Dec 2021
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
GeForce 200M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1185 MHz
Base Clock
-
1477 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
16
SM Count
16
2048
Shading Units
128
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
47.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
94.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
12.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.050 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
189.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
45W
TDP
75W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
N10E-GTX1-B1
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.754 billion
Unknown
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
