GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs FirePro W4190M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 64% (1477MHz vs 900MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
+775%
6050
FirePro W4190M
691
Graphics Card
Dec 2021
Release Date
Nov 2015
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1185 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1477 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
6
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
64
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
47.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
94.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
12.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.050 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
189.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
Unknown
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.1
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Opal
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.95 billion
Unknown
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)