GeForce MX250 vs Radeon RX Vega M GH
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega M GH to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 100W)
Radeon RX Vega M GH 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 15% (1190MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (204.8GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
797
Radeon RX Vega M GH
+358%
3656
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX250
1079
Radeon RX Vega M GH
+169%
2907
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce MX250
222
Radeon RX Vega M GH
+472%
1271
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Feb 2018
GeForce MX
Generation
Vega
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
IGP
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
1063 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
1024bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
204.8GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
24
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
1536
24
TMUs
96
16
ROPs
64
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
76.16 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.656 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
228.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
100W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
Polaris 22
-
GPU Variant
VegaM XT
(C7398773)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
5 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
208 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4