GeForce MX250 vs Radeon E2400
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 25W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
+1560%
797
Radeon E2400
48
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce MX
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
40
24
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.00 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
10W
TDP
25W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
RV610
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0