GeForce MX250 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 75W)
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1291MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
797
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q
+148%
1983
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX250
1079
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q
+105%
2212
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce MX250
222
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q
+357%
1016
Blender
GeForce MX250
72
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q
+286%
278
OctaneBench
GeForce MX250
22
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max Q
+104%
45
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2018
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 10 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
1152 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
6
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.97 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
30.98 GFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.983 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.97 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
75W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
GP107
-
GPU Variant
N17P-G1-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
