Home Comparison GeForce MX230 vs Radeon R5 A320

GeForce MX230 vs Radeon R5 A320

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX230 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R5 A320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce MX230 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 86% (1531MHz vs 825MHz)
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
Radeon R5 A320 's Advantages
64 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX230 +48%
784
Radeon R5 A320
528

Graphics Card

Feb 2019
Release Date
Jan 2015
GeForce MX
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1519 MHz
Base Clock
750 MHz
1531 MHz
Boost Clock
825 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
2
SM Count
-
256
Shading Units
320
16
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

24.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
24.50 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.50 GTexel/s
12.25 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
783.9 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
528.0 GFLOPS
24.50 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

10W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
Jet
N17S-G0-A1
GPU Variant
Jet PRO (216-0856040)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.69 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
56 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
© 2025 - TopCPU.net