GeForce MX150 vs GeForce GT 435M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 435M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1532MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 35W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX150
+418%
1177
GeForce GT 435M
227
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX150
+564%
1004
GeForce GT 435M
151
Graphics Card
May 2017
Release Date
Jan 2011
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 400M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1469 MHz
Base Clock
-
1532 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
3
SM Count
2
384
Shading Units
96
24
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
24.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.360 GPixel/s
36.77 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.440 GTexel/s
18.38 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1177 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
226.6 GFLOPS
36.77 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
18.88 GFLOPS
Board Design
25W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108
GPU Name
GF106
GP108-650-A1
(N17S-G1-A1)
GPU Variant
N11E-GE-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
