Home Comparison GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon R7 250 OEM

GeForce GTX TITAN X vs Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM GeForce GTX TITAN X and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX TITAN X 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 4% (1089MHz vs 1050MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX TITAN X +730%
6691
Radeon R7 250 OEM
806

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 900
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1089 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

12GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
3072
Shading Units
384
192
TMUs
24
96
ROPs
8
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

104.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
209.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
6.691 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
209.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
65W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM200
GPU Name
Oland
GM200-400-A1
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net