GeForce GTX TITAN X vs FirePro RG220A
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM GeForce GTX TITAN X and 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX TITAN X 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1089MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
2992 additional rendering cores
FirePro RG220A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX TITAN X
+8263%
6691
FirePro RG220A
80
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
May 2010
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1089 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
3072
Shading Units
80
192
TMUs
8
96
ROPs
4
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
104.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
209.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
6.691 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
209.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
250W
TDP
35W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM200
GPU Name
M93
GM200-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.242 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
73 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1