GeForce GTX 770 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 770 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 96% (2130MHz vs 1085MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 224.4GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 230W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 770
3333
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+260%
12000
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 770
2153
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+278%
8147
Blender
GeForce GTX 770
252
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+951%
2649
OctaneBench
GeForce GTX 770
38
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+676%
295
Graphics Card
May 2013
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 700
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1046 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
224.4GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
22
1536
Shading Units
2816
128
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
34.72 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
138.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
3.333 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
138.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
230W
TDP
70W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
AD107
GK104-425-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
