GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon RX Vega Nano
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Lower TDP (60W vs 175W)
Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (1546MHz vs 1085MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
1389
Radeon RX Vega Nano
+811%
12660
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 700
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
1247 MHz
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
64
640
Shading Units
4096
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Vega 10
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT
(215-0894200)
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4