GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs FireStream 9370
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
Lower TDP (60W vs 225W)
FireStream 9370 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
1389
FireStream 9370
+90%
2640
Graphics Card
Feb 2014
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 700
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1020 MHz
Base Clock
-
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
20
640
Shading Units
1600
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
60W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
Cypress
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Maxwell
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
