GeForce GTX 680M vs RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 92% (1455MHz vs 758MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680M
2038
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation
+338%
8940
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 600M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
719 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
758 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
24
1344
Shading Units
3072
112
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
21.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
84.90 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
2.038 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
84.90 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
35W
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
AD107
N13E-GTX-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
