GeForce GTX 680M vs Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 680M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 100.4GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1021MHz vs 758MHz)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680M
+29%
2038
Radeon R9 M380 Mac Edition
1568
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 600M
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
719 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
758 MHz
Boost Clock
1021 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1568 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
100.4GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
12
1344
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
21.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.34 GPixel/s
84.90 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
49.01 GTexel/s
2.038 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.568 TFLOPS
84.90 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
Unknown
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Strato
N13E-GTX-A2
GPU Variant
Strato PRO
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.170
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5