Home Comparison GeForce GTX 680 vs TITAN Ada

GeForce GTX 680 vs TITAN Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 and 48GB VRAM TITAN Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 680 's Advantages
Lower TDP (195W vs 800W)
TITAN Ada 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 138% (2520MHz vs 1058MHz)
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.15TB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
16896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680
3250
TITAN Ada +2758%
92900

Graphics Card

Mar 2012
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 600
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1006 MHz
Base Clock
2235 MHz
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6X
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
1.15TB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
144
1536
Shading Units
18432
128
TMUs
576
32
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
576
-
RT Cores
144
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

33.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
135.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1452 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
92.90 TFLOPS
3.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
92.90 TFLOPS
135.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1452 GFLOPS

Board Design

195W
TDP
800W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
AD102
GK104-400-A2
GPU Variant
AD102-450-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net