Home Comparison GeForce GTX 680 vs FirePro W9100

GeForce GTX 680 vs FirePro W9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 680 's Advantages
Boost Clock1058MHz
Lower TDP (195W vs 275W)
FirePro W9100 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680
3250
FirePro W9100 +61%
5238
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce GTX 680
2004
FirePro W9100 +77%
3552

Graphics Card

Mar 2012
Release Date
Mar 2014
GeForce 600
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1006 MHz
Base Clock
-
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
1536
Shading Units
2816
128
TMUs
176
32
ROPs
64
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

33.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
135.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
3.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
135.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

195W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Hawaii
GK104-400-A2
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3
© 2025 - TopCPU.net