GeForce GTX 680 vs FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 680 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1058MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1496 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 195W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680
+10056%
3250
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
32
Graphics Card
Mar 2012
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 600
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x1
Clock Speeds
1006 MHz
Base Clock
-
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
2
1536
Shading Units
40
128
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
33.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
135.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
3.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
135.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
195W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x VHDCI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
RV620
GK104-400-A2
GPU Variant
RC620 PRO
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1