GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs FireStream 9350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1058MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 128.0GB/s)
96 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 195W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
+61%
3250
FireStream 9350
2016
Graphics Card
Apr 2013
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 600
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1006 MHz
Base Clock
-
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
18
1536
Shading Units
1440
128
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
32
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
33.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
135.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
50.40 GTexel/s
3.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.016 TFLOPS
135.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
403.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
195W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
Cypress
GK104-400-A2
GPU Variant
Cypress PRO GL
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0