GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition vs FireGL V5600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1058MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
1416 additional rendering cores
FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 195W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 680 Mac Edition
+1592%
3250
FireGL V5600
192
Graphics Card
Apr 2013
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 600
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1006 MHz
Base Clock
-
1058 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
1536
Shading Units
120
128
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
33.86 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
135.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
3.250 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
135.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
195W
TDP
89W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
RV630
GK104-400-A2
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
