GeForce GTX 650 vs RTX 4000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 650 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 130W)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
5760 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650
812
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+3191%
26730
Blender
GeForce GTX 650
47
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+9978%
4737
OctaneBench
GeForce GTX 650
13
RTX 4000 Ada Generation
+3684%
492
Graphics Card
Sep 2012
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 600
Generation
Workstation Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
48
384
Shading Units
6144
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
Theoretical Performance
8.464 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
139.2 GPixel/s
33.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
812.5 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
33.86 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
AD104
GK107-450-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.8
