Home Comparison GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

GeForce GTX 650 Ti vs RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti and 12GB VRAM RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2250MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
4352 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 110W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti
1425
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation +1516%
23040

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 600
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1725 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2250 MHz
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
40
768
Shading Units
5120
64
TMUs
160
16
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
160
-
RT Cores
40
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB

Theoretical Performance

14.85 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
144.0 GPixel/s
59.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
360.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.04 TFLOPS
1425 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
23.04 TFLOPS
59.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
360.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

110W
TDP
100W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
AD104
GK106-220-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
© 2025 - TopCPU.net