GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 106% (2130MHz vs 1032MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 144.2GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
1585
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+657%
12000
Blender
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
103
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+2471%
2649
OctaneBench
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
23
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1182%
295
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 600
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
980 MHz
Base Clock
1620 MHz
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
144.2GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
22
768
Shading Units
2816
64
TMUs
88
24
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
384 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
16.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
66.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
1.585 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
66.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
AD107
GK106-240-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
