GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1032MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9170 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
+218%
1585
FireStream 9170
497
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 600
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
980 MHz
Base Clock
-
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
144.2GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
768
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
16
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
384 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
66.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
1.585 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
66.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
105W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
RV670
GK106-240-A1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1