GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost vs FireGL V5600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost and 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1032MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.2GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 134W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
+725%
1585
FireGL V5600
192
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 600
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
980 MHz
Base Clock
-
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1100 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR4
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
144.2GB/s
Bandwidth
35.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
768
Shading Units
120
64
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
384 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
66.05 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.400 GTexel/s
1.585 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
192.0 GFLOPS
66.05 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
134W
TDP
89W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI 1.4a
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK106
GPU Name
RV630
GK106-240-A1
GPU Variant
RV630 GL
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
