GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 vs FireStream 9170
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.3GB/s vs 51.33GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
FireStream 9170 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (105W vs 170W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 560 Ti X2
+162%
1306
FireStream 9170
497
Graphics Card
Jan 2011
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 500
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
802 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
128.3GB/s
Bandwidth
51.33GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
8
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
320
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
13.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.43 GPixel/s
54.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.43 GTexel/s
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
497.3 GFLOPS
108.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
99.46 GFLOPS
Board Design
170W
TDP
105W
450 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
3x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GF114
GPU Name
RV670
GF114-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
