GeForce GTX 460 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
2480 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460
907
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
+1223%
12000
Graphics Card
Jul 2010
Release Date
Feb 2024
GeForce 400
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
7
SM Count
22
336
Shading Units
2816
56
TMUs
88
24
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
384 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
Theoretical Performance
9.450 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
907.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
75.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
160W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GF104
GPU Name
AD107
GF104-300-KB-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
