Home Comparison GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon Instinct MI308X

GeForce GTX 460 vs Radeon Instinct MI308X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 768MB VRAM GeForce GTX 460 and 192GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI308X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

GeForce GTX 460 's Advantages
Lower TDP (160W vs 750W)
Radeon Instinct MI308X 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (10.3TB/s vs 86.40GB/s)
19120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 460
907
Radeon Instinct MI308X +8909%
81720

Graphics Card

Jul 2010
Release Date
Dec 2023
GeForce 400
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
2525 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
192bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
10.3TB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
7
SM Count
-
336
Shading Units
19456
56
TMUs
1216
24
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1216
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
384 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
L3 Cache
256 MB

Theoretical Performance

9.450 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
37.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2554 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
653.7 TFLOPS
907.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
81.72 TFLOPS
75.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.72 TFLOPS

Board Design

160W
TDP
750W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1150 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF104
GPU Name
Aqua Vanjaram
GF104-300-KB-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.95 billion
Transistors
153 billion
332 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A
© 2025 - TopCPU.net