GeForce GTX 295 vs FireMV 2400 PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
More VRAM (896GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
240 additional rendering cores
FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 289W)
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 200
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
999 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR
448bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
-
240
Shading Units
-
80
TMUs
4
28
ROPs
4
224 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
289W
TDP
20W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
RV380
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Rage 9
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
130 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
9.0
3.3
OpenGL
2.0
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
-
