GeForce GTX 295 vs CMP 30HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 and 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
CMP 30HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
1168 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (125W vs 289W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 295
596
CMP 30HX
+743%
5027
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Feb 2021
GeForce 200
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1530 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
999 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
896MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
448bit
Memory Bus
192bit
111.9GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
22
240
Shading Units
1408
80
TMUs
88
28
ROPs
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
224 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
Theoretical Performance
16.13 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
46.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
596.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
74.52 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
289W
TDP
125W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI
1x HDMI
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
TU116
G200-401-B3
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
