GeForce GTX 260M vs Radeon E9174 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260M and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9174 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Radeon E9174 MXM 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1219MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 60.80GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 65W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 260M
308
Radeon E9174 MXM
+305%
1248
Graphics Card
Mar 2009
Release Date
Oct 2017
GeForce 200M
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1124 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
950 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
60.80GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
14
SM Count
-
112
Shading Units
512
56
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
8.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
30.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
308.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS
Board Design
65W
TDP
50W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
G92
GPU Name
Lexa
N10E-GT
GPU Variant
E9170
Tesla
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.754 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
324 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.4
