GeForce GTX 1660 vs CMP 40HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1785MHz vs 1650MHz)
Lower TDP (120W vs 185W)
CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 192.1GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660
5027
CMP 40HX
+51%
7603
Blender
GeForce GTX 1660
705
CMP 40HX
+66%
1174
Graphics Card
Mar 2019
Release Date
Feb 2021
GeForce 16
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1470 MHz
1785 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.1GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
22
SM Count
36
1408
Shading Units
2304
88
TMUs
144
48
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
Theoretical Performance
85.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
157.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
10.05 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
5.027 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
157.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
120W
TDP
185W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
TU106
TU116-300-A1
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
Turing
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
12 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
7.5
6.6
Shader Model
6.8
