GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs FirePro 2460 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1456 additional rendering cores
FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 120W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
+6696%
5437
FirePro 2460 Multi View
80
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 16
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
1
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
80
96
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
-
Theoretical Performance
84.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
169.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.000 GTexel/s
10.87 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
169.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
120W
TDP
17W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
Cedar
TU116-400-A1
GPU Variant
Cedar GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0