GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs FireGL V7600
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1770MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (120W vs 127W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
+1315%
5437
FireGL V7600
384
Graphics Card
Feb 2019
Release Date
Aug 2007
GeForce 16
Generation
FireGL
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
1770 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
24
SM Count
-
1536
Shading Units
320
96
TMUs
16
48
ROPs
16
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
84.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
169.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
10.87 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.437 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
169.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
120W
TDP
127W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
TU116
GPU Name
R600
TU116-400-A1
GPU Variant
R600 GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
80 nm
6.6 billion
Transistors
0.72 billion
284 mm²
Die Size
420 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
4.0
